News
Welcome to the Kent Island Defense League Offical Web Site!
 

Kent Island Defense League wins extension of time 
By MARGOT MOHSBERG, Kent Island Staff Writer 

Just 10 signatures short of forcing a referendum over the controversial 1,350-home Four Seasons project, the Kent Island Defense League has won a 40-day extension of the petition deadline. 

The county Board of Elections granted the extension Monday based on a county law which governs petitions for referendums. 

League President Rick Moser said he has no doubt that the group will collect enough signatures by the new, mid-November deadline. 

"A lot of people have signed our petition," he said. "There's a lot of people who don't like development in the critical areas or at all on Kent Island and they want to be able to vote on it in the next election." 

Few if any other groups in recent memory have forced a referendum onto the ballot. The Defense League's effort has organizations such as the Queen Anne's County Chamber of Commerce campaigning against the petition. 

"Unfortunately, I don't think the rank-and-file voter knows what can be lost if this issue goes to referendum," said Chamber President Jim Sowden. 

The Defense League needs to submit 2,200 signatures, or 10 percent of the registered county voters, to get on the 2002 ballot. It had 2,190 confirmed signatures by the deadline Sunday, and will be collecting more signatures this weekend at the Acme and Food Lion supermarkets. 

Two weeks after the county commissioners voted to allow intense development in the Critical Area, members of the grassroots organization announced their plan to circulate a petition to force a referendum on the issue. 

"We didn't get started until Sept. 15, so it was a pretty short deadline," Mr. Moser said. 

They argued that residents should have a bigger say in the age-restricted development planned for 562 acres on Castle Marina Road in both Stevensville and Chester. 

"That's the American way," said Mr. Moser. 

Specifically, the referendum will ask county voters if they believe the county should have granted growth allocation. 

If the dispute goes to a referendum, Four Seasons developer K. Hovnanian Cos. will change its plans to conform to current zoning regulations. 

"If the petition to referendum succeeds, K. Hovnanian cannot afford to wait another 14 months to see if we can even proceed with our proposed active adult community," Mark Stemen, area president of the company, told the Queen Anne's County Chamber of Commerce on Sept. 20. 

"We have made tremendous investments in our time and financial resources and we simply will not walk away from the land we own." 

So far, the county Board of Commissioners has not taken a position on the petition. 

However, Mr. Sowden, the chamber president, said that if Four Seasons is not given the growth allocation it needs to move forward as planned, the county will lose millions of dollars in tax revenues, sewer and water upgrades and support for local volunteer fire departments. It also will lose a major economic boost for local businesses. 

County officials will review all collected signatures to make sure they are valid. 

Published October 03, 2001, The Capital, Annapolis, Md.
Copyright © 2001 The Capital, Annapolis, Md.


Note from KIDL:  The following quote is from The Capital on 8/15/01 after the KIDL filed an appeal on August 8th to the Critical Area Commission's approval of growth allocation of Four Seasons, 
The Q.A.C. Commissioners approved the Growth Allocation "ordinance" on Aug 21,
  one week after Mr. O'Donnell's comment , quote which follows below:

"County Commissioners President George O'Donnell said the Kent Island Defense League should have waited to go to the courts until at least after hearing the commissioners' final decision on the project.   He didn't expect the commissioners to vote on it anytime in the 'near future.' " The Capital August 15, 2001
 

KIDL Web Guy Asks... 
  • Mr. O'Donnell, what is your definition of  'near future'? ... you voted YES the next week, on the 21st. 
  • Was the Vote listed on the agenda?  Our observer did not see it. 
  • Why  has the attorney representing the Commission filed a motion asking that the League's request be thrown out? 
 

 
 
Return Home
Return Home
Read More News
Read More News

Site by:
AmericanWebPageDesign
Stevensville, MD