Comparable training centers
fail to sway Ruthsburg facility's opponents
By Morgan Gibson | Capital
News Service
2:32 p.m. EST, March 13,
2010
WASHINGTON - Battle
lines are drawn on the Eastern Shore over a proposed State Department training
center planned for tiny Ruthsburg.
But people who live near
similar facilities in Sykesville and Brunswick, Ga., say the centers have
been good neighbors and the surrounding communities have never experienced
the controversy and resistance seen now in Queen Anne's County.
"If those folks up there
in Maryland don't want them, send them here," M.H. "Woody" Woodside, president
of the local Chamber of Commerce and 30-year resident of Glynn County,
Ga., said about the Ruthsburg project.
Tension in the Eastern Shore
community has been high since November, when Hunt Ray Farm near Ruthsburg
was announced as the preferred site for the 2,000-acre Federal Affairs
Security Training Center.
The anti-terrorism and security
training center would encompass explosives training, firing ranges and
racetracks, as well as classrooms and housing for the students. The $150
million to $500 million project, funded partly by $70 million in stimulus
money, would consolidate 19 other training facilities into one.
Many local residents and
business owners support FASTC, saying it would provide a much-needed economic
boost, creating jobs and putting more people in their restaurants, hotels
and other businesses.
Opponents argue that the
400 anticipated jobs wouldn't all go to Queen Anne's County residents,
and that the economic impact wouldn't outweigh the negatives, such as the
potentially harmful environmental effects, especially on Tuckahoe Creek,
within the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Opponents are also concerned that
noise from firing ranges and explosives training will disrupt their quiet
life, and scare their children or spook their horses.
Failure by the General Services
Administration, which is responsible for the early stages of the project,
to answer residents' questions and ease local concern prompted a rebuke
from Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., who demanded that GSA push back the
deadline for public comment and requested a tour of a similar facility
for the site's neighbors.
In response, GSA moved the
comment deadline and arranged a tour of the Public Safety Education and
Training Center in Sykesville, which, like FASTC, has firing ranges, driving
tracks and an urban driving grid.
On March 3, some Ruthsburg
residents and representatives from the offices of Miluski, Rep. Frank Kratovil,
D- Stevensville, and Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., toured Sykesville so they
could see the kinds of training facilities FASTC would contain.
"We certainly feel that this
tour was a good step forward in talking with the community and continuing
dialogue with the community," Cardin's Communications Director Susan Sullam
said. "The senator wants to ensure that the process continues to move forward
and that all the questions and concerns of the community are answered,
and this is a part of that process."
Others say the tour was less
than a success.
Sherry Adam, a Ruthsburg
resident and FASTC opponent, said the tour didn't give her a sense for
how FASTC would be operated. Adam also complained she didn't see any students.
"It was like a freaking ghost
town," she said. "We wasted the entire day to see nothing."
GSA spokesman Chris Hoagland
said, "This site was selected because it was the closest facility with
a similar, although not identical, training mission, and because the Maryland
Congressional delegation suggested touring a Maryland-based site."
The Sykesville facility is
a little more than a third the size of FASTC, and while both facilities
have firing ranges and tracks, the Ruthsburg site has more of them. FASTC
would also have weekly explosive detonations, whereas the Sykesville facility
only has two per year.
The Sykesville community
has a positive relationship with the facility.
Matt Candland, Sykesville's
town manager, said the town and the facility coexist peacefully, that the
police cars from the facility frequently use the town's gas stations and
sometimes its restaurants. He said there aren't really complaints, just
occasionally some questions.
"It's nice to have more cops
around," said Gail Holliday, a Sykesville business owner and resident.
The locations of the two
facilities are very different. Sykesville, with a population of around
5,000, is a mountainous historic town with some pastoral patches, but is
largely a developing, suburban area. Ruthsburg has maybe a couple hundred
people and no mayor or post office, just miles of bucolic farmland.
Holliday has been in Sykesville
for 15 years and lives about four miles from the facility. While she doesn't
have any qualms about the facility, Holliday said comparing the Sykesville
facility to the Ruthsburg project might be "comparing apples to oranges."
The Sykesville property was
owned by the state before the training center was built, and it used to
be a state mental institution.
"It's different than taking
over 2,000 acres of someone's farmland," Holliday said.
The only truly comparable
federal facility, Hoagland said, is the Federal Law Enforcement Training
Center in Glynn County, Ga., because of its "size, operational activities,
scope of training, and location."
Both facilities do the same
types of training, but the Georgia facility trains more than double the
amount of students at a slightly smaller campus.
The Georgia facility, which
has been in Brunswick since 1975, occupies a former naval air station base,
Woodside said. When the station's closing was announced, the community
worried about the impact it would have on the area.
Woodside said the town worked
hard to get the training center into its area, and he was part of the congressional
staff that got it there.
"We needed the jobs and the
opportunities," Woodside said. "And we've enjoyed every minute of their
experience there."
The economic impact on the
community has been very positive, Woodside said. Georgia Tech conducted
a study in 2003 identifying the training center as the largest employer
in Glynn County.
Northside Baptist Church
adjoins the facility and Senior Pastor Craig Hartzog said the church views
it as a very good neighbor. Hartzog said he hardly hears any real criticism
of the training center and that it is strongly embraced by the community.
They do hear explosives,
"the screech of rubber" and gunfire quite often, he said, but it's just
become part of a normal and routine day, much like living near a military
base.
Brunswick is a small, suburban
town with about 20,000 primarily blue-collar residents and a big seafood
industry, Hartzog said, and "it's miles before you get to any kind of farmland."
Unlike the other two facilities,
which were converted from other institutions, FASTC would be placed on
what is currently residential farmland, not a piece of government-owned
property.
"They're purchasing some
of the most premium farmland on the Eastern Shore," said David Dunmyer,
a Ruthsburg business owner and FASTC opponent. "It's a rural, agricultural
area, and that's why people live there."
The public comment period
ended March 12. The environmental assessment will be published in late
March or early April. It will take into account all the comments and concerns
that have been voiced and map out the potential impacts of the facility.
Copyright © 2010, The
Baltimore Sun
Back to Top
Read
More FASTC Letters
Read
More FASTC News
|